I argued against Trump impeachment in
<this post>.
The Ukraine allegations have shifted the balance, and of course I am
far from alone in reaching that conclusion. I find myself in
agreement with most of the articles and "friendly" op-eds
in the New York Times. I don't think I have much to add beyond what
they say, which makes it tempting to skip this blog post. But I'll
make it anyway.
I argued before that if you can't get a
conviction, it's best not to impeach. But the Ukraine case changes
things. Trump is using the power of his office with foreign
governments to help get him reelected in 2020, and that undermines
our democracy going forward, not just in retrospect.
I can't say I'm newly outraged. My
outrage meter has been pegged to the top of the gauge for a long time
now. Reasons to be outraged about Trump are layered one on top of the
other... there are many layers. Instead of feeling outraged, I'm
rather hoping this is an opportunity to get rid of Trump and Trumpism
more effectively in the 2020 election -- and perhaps to constrain his
behavior between now and then.
A big part of the problem is that the
crucial constituency here are those ardent pro-Trump voters who vote
in disproportionate numbers in Senate primary contests. Republican
senators are very wary of provoking their ire. So the politics
centers heavily on what those pro-Trump voters think.
What do they really think? What would
it take for some significant portion of them to abandon Trump? I
don't really know.
When Trump was elected, I worried that
he might simply order the military to arrest Congress. The leftists
and centrists would be outraged, but would it be enough? Would Trump
voters have just cheered him on as President For Life? There are of
course ways to subvert democracy without arresting Congress, and
Trump has already used some of those methods (as in withholding a
contract from Amazon because of Jeff Bezos's politics), but the
subtlety might well be lost on Trump voters.
The readiness with which Trump and
allies (including notably Fox News) will lie and obfuscate is
concerning. A look at the Fox page shows their guns are blazing as
never before. Earlier today there was an "Aha!" story
claiming Schiff did the same thing as Trump. Why? Because some
prankster claiming to be from Ukraine with dirt on Trump called him a
couple years ago and he said he would be interested in that
information. There is just no parallel. When someone offers
information to someone in the intelligence community, they naturally
take it. Whether they find it credible when they get it and what they
would do with it are separate questions, but accepting the
information is not a problem.
There are three key parties on the
Republican side of this issue. First, Trump is a strange, despicable
human being. Second, there are Trump voters, and I don't know what
makes them tick. They might just be very ignorant, and think there's
nothing more important at stake than how it feels good when Trump
zings people they don't like. There are people (and not just
right-wingers) who think "Don't vote, it just encourages them"
is a funny bumper sticker. Third, there are the Republican senators.
I'm convinced they aren't ignorant and they know enough history to
understand the danger of tyranny. You imagine most of them would
personally prefer a Pence presidency to a Trump presidency, if their
voters would let them get away with it. And now it's time for them to
look in the mirror. On the one side, democracy itself is at stake.
The price of liberty is eternal vigilance and the spotlight is now on
them. On the other side, their jobs might be at risk if they can't
sell an anti-Trump position. Lots of us face job insecurity, and risk
losing our jobs if we do the right thing. We can sympathize with
people who don't do the right thing if losing the job means financial
ruin. But ex-senators do not face financial ruin.
Positive things could happen without
Trump actually being removed from office. If Republican senators
privately tell him that they will vote against him if he goes too
far, it could moderate his behavior without the senators having to
pay the political price.
If we assume that Trump is defeated in
2020, the picture still does not look very good unless the Democrats
retake the Senate. We face ongoing gridlock in this highly polarized
era unless Senate, House, and President are all from the same party.
I suppose Republican senators might worry about losing to a Democrat
in the final election, as well as worrying about losing to a Trump
supporter in the primary. I don't have strong intuitions about how
the impeachment process will play out in terms of the Senate count.
If tribalism continues, Republican-leaning states will continue to
elect Republican senators.
But far more is at stake here than
partisan politics. Much as I dislike Pence's politics, I do not have
any reason to think he is inclined to disrupt international relations
and the integrity of the political process. I just hope there is not
some other demagogue ready to take Trump's place if he goes.
No comments:
Post a Comment